WHO’S THE BLACKEST OF THEM ALL?

Posted: February 15, 2016 in 2016 Presidential Election, America Asleep, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Obama
Tags: , , ,

Tube Heading Steamed

 

WHO’S THE BLACKEST OF THEM ALL?

So as we Americans proceed with the rigged circus of elections the age old question has reared its ugly head, once again.

If you recall it was only around 2007 that the BIG question was: “IS BARACK OBAMA BLACK ENOUGH”?

And how could anyone forget Joe Biden’s convincing comment in calling Obama the “first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,”

Ahh YES! “bright and clean”! There’s just not many of those kind of knegros in the land of the free!

But of course we all know that Barack came from a “white-stock” U.S. mother and a father that is a “black-stock” Kenyan. So, Barack was watered down from PURE white which makes him biracial! And biracial are ALWAYS BLACK. BUT NOT WHITE!

And we all know that the U.S. of America is in its post-racial-period so we, as a country, are past all that concern over race. After all we elected one of those “bright and clean” ones to be our President!

Now that it is 2016 we have a new issue IS BERNIE OR HILLARY BLACK ENOUGH?

mirror mirror on the wall who’s the blackest of them all?

mirror mirror on the wall
who’s the blackest of them all?

You see the establishment media has been on Hillary’s team from the beginning. The first clue, Dr. Watson, was elemental. They just didn’t cover Bernie. Even when his crowd sizes were larger than Hillary’s and Trump’s. Not a peep! It was like he never was there.

But when it became clear that there was some kind of bias in favor of Hillary the establishment press started to cover Bernie except they used their photos and headlines to focus on Hillary in a positive light and Bernie not so much.

So that is why presently we have a big push from the establishment to convince all of us that the Clintons HAVE ALWAYS LOVED BLACK PEOPLE and were there during the civil rights struggle standing shoulder to shoulder with their BLACK BROTHERS AND SISTERS fighting the good fight for freedom and justice for all.

Even Congressman John Lewis who was a major leader within the civil rights movement in the 1960’s  joined in to cast doubt on Bernie Sanders’ involvement in the Civil Rights movement.

He stated that, “I never saw him. I never met him. I was chair of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee for three years, from 1963 to 1966. I was involved with the sit-ins, the Freedom Rides, the March on Washington, the march from Selma to Montgomery and directed (the) voter education project for six years. But I met Hillary Clinton. I met President (Bill) Clinton.”

But funny thing, Congressman Lewis in his statement doesn’t say WHEN he met Hillary and Bill. The way that statement was stated IMPLIES the Clinton’s were involved in the Civil Rights Movement in the ’60. They weren’t! Bernie was involved!

Congressman Lewis just lied or just misdirected his statement to make it appear the Civil Rights Movement and the Clinton’s were tied together?

In Congressman Lewis’ own words in a section contributed by him in 2001 in the book by Janis Kearney, Conversations: William Jefferson Clinton, From Hope to Harlem he states, “The first time I heard of Bill Clinton was in the early 70s . . . think I paid more attention to him at the 1988 Democratic Convention . . . But it was one of his aides, Rodney Slater, who actually introduced us in 1991”.

You do the math …… 1963 ……. 1991. If Tubularsock is not mistaken, the Freedom Rides were over!

As for Hillary she went with her church group to hear Dr. Martin Luther King in 1962.

Hillary was 13 years old. And was not on the forefront of the Civil Rights Movement.

But the way the now establishment Lewis stated it one could be made to believe that Hillary and Bill were in the middle of it all. THEY WERE NOT!

It is obvious to Tubularsock that Congressman Lewis knows which side of his chit’lin is buttered on!

And then there was Time Magazine.

There is photographic evidence that Bernie Sanders WAS involved in the Civil Rights Movement. He was involved in the sit-in at the University of Chicago administration building protesting discrimination against blacks in university owned housing.

“I took the photograph of Bernie Sanders speaking to his fellow CORE members at that sit-in” stated Danny Lyon the student photographer at the University of Chicago, making pictures for the yearbook, the Alumni Magazine and the student paper, The Maroon.

Lyon (now a celebrated photographer) verified that the photos that he took included Sanders and that Time Magazine and the Clinton machine that have attempted to discredit the photos as not being Sanders have done so to misinform the electorate. Oh no, say it isn’t so!!!

The CORE sit-in that Bernie helped lead was the first civil rights sit-in to take place in the North.”

Now will the Black voters in South Carolina which are significant and the Black voters in general be fooled into thinking that Hillary and her Banker-Class will do more for them than Bernie and his economic reform program?

Guess it depends just how awake the Black community happens to be.

WE SHALL OVERCOME is only worth something if all the people wake up to the game being implemented. The sad truth is that to date it’s the LIE that wins.

Hillary is a LIE just like Obummer is a LIE …….

So far in America, THE LIES HAVE IT!

Tube Sig.red

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Michael Fuhrig says:

    Tube:
    Very persuasive! If Bernie can dance and shoot a hoop or two you’ve made your case!

    Liked by 1 person

    • tubularsock says:

      Good point Mike, but Tubularsock doubts he can do either. Tubularsock doesn’t even know if Bernie can golf! Isn’t that refreshing?

      Bernie unfortunately is a hawk just like the rest of them so that is the downside. And for him to do his domestic policy ideas the wars would have to stop so a vote for Bernie would be pretty much symbolic for a domestic shift.

      But Bernie has a life time of principled work under his belt and the only one who has ANY core principles at all.

      So what can you do ………

      The United States has the most expensive “free-elections” on the planet but the results rests on who counts the votes.

      Thanks for your comment.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hariod Brawn says:

    It’s all so farcical, or so it seems from over here in England, where most of the media seem largely focused on the apparent rowdy disintegration of the other side – we live in hope! Does Bernie stand a chance? I can’t really tell from what I hear, but it seems to be a slim one if it’s there at all, given how black Hilary is. Then again, Jeremy Corbyn was given zero chance of being elected leader of The Labour Party, and if, in the upcoming referendum, we Brits vote to leave the EU, and the whole pack of Eurocards collapses as a result, and China continues to wobble resulting in another big banking/liquidity crash soon, then Corbyn would likely be our next PM. And that was totally unconceivable only a year ago. Just one question for you Tubularsock – what is a chit’lin?

    Liked by 1 person

    • tubularsock says:

      Hariod, Tubularsock thanks you for stepping into the cesspool that is American politics. Farcical is a great description of what goes on in these continuous elections in this country. The ultimate in the Theater of the Absurd.

      Here’s the deal.

      Now how best to describe this ……. ahhh, “There’s many a slip twixt the cup and the lip”!
      And the system of voting has these loop holes to protect the power structure from the people.

      Durning this primary phase the members of the respective parties vote for delegates to go off and carouse with whores while they vote for the candidate that won their state primary and they represent.

      In some states the delegates are required by law to vote for the candidate that won the popular election. In other states the delegates are obliged to but really don’t HAVE to vote for the candidate that won their primary. Which may explain just how good the whores happen to be that will determine this “democratic process”!

      In either case, after the first vote at the convention if no one wins then the delegates are allowed to vote for whomever they wish.

      On top of that there are the “superdelegates”!

      These are delegates seated based on other positions they hold in the Party and
      additional “unpledged” delegates selected by each state party. (another step to protect the power structure from the people)

      So your question, “Does Bernie have a chance?”

      Tubularsock would have to say NO.

      The Convention is built on influence peddling at all levels and money and promissory notes are the order of the day.

      So it is conceivable that a candidate could win the popular vote but loose the Convention vote.

      As Hillary Clinton’s hero Henry Kissinger once said after the U.S. overthrew the democratic elected President of Chile, “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” 

      So Hariod, that is the snapshot vision of American politics.

      Now for the REAL question:

      Chit’lin is more of a slang term for Chitterlings, which are usually the small intestines of a pig, although the intestines of cattle and other animals are sometimes so named when used as a foodstuff.

      And in truth one wouldn’t really “butter” them but rather fry them in bacon grease.
      Tubularsock taste leans away from “peasant-food” because they taste nasty!

      Liked by 2 people

  3. donzo442 says:

    Smoke, mirrors, and blackface. It’s all a freaking trick. With the amerikan people being mostly clueless and beaten into submission, the race for POTUS will go to whomever has the deepest pockets.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. sojourner says:

    Is this an election year? I guess I just haven’t been paying attention. I knew you were running, but I thought that was last year? Did you win last year?

    I need to get with it. But who is this Bernie character everyone keeps talking about? Hillary I know. She’s the one Bill never rapes anymore. Can you blame him? Gag a maggot! And who is this card playing guy, this trump?

    All I can say is the tumor must have been moving again, and so I’ve been unconscious for quite a while now.

    Of course, after reading what I have been blogging lately, I’m sure others have thought I was unconscious as well!

    Liked by 2 people

  5. sojourner says:

    I’m sorry, Tubularsock, I just couldn’t resist giving you back one of your non sequitur comments.

    All of this bullshit, this every four year farce, never ceases to amaze me. And why should we be surprised that this Congressman Lewis is in on this Clinton scam. Hasn’t anyone ever heard of Al Sharpton, and who’s that other guy? Oh yeah, Jackson!

    And speaking of Bernie, the man is behind the military industrial complex just as much as the others. He’s bullshitting the public, just as Obomber did eight years ago.

    Political stooges all. The scum of the earth. It’s all these assholes can be, being former business men, shysters and politicians. It comes with the territory.

    I’ll quote Frank’s little girl, Nancy, here: “And the beat goes on, and the beat goes on…” Or maybe something a little closer to being up to date: “Same as it ever was! Same as it ever was!”

    Liked by 1 person

    • tubularsock says:

      Well yes, Tubularsock agrees with you sojourner and Tubularsock will go with the Green Party but Bernie does at least have some principles he has lived by and have defended and voted for during his time in the political parade.

      His weakness in foreign affairs is a too “bader” but out of all of them he does have some great domestic policy ideas.

      The power structure won’t let him in so Hillary’s our girl for prom-night. Tubularsock’s going stag!

      Thanks for your comment.

      Liked by 1 person

      • sojourner says:

        Yes, I know. But Obomber sounded good at points, as well.

        Hillary’s in? Not so certain yet. I read and article today that claimed Bernie or Hillary will mean a Repub victory. And this was not a right-leaning main stream source.

        Either way, it will all be worthless!

        It’s not really the players as much as it is the game that needs to be dumped!

        Liked by 1 person

      • tubularsock says:

        It is true Obummer sounded good but if you had looked into what he had stood for in his past it didn’t look that good. Tubularsock attempted to warn people at the time but that “hope and change” shit won out.

        Bernie at least speaks for what he stands for and has a life long record to prove it. Tubularsock still’s going Green but Bernie is the best of what is offered. Which is shit wrapped in red, white, and blue!

        But let Tubularsock stand out on the limb once again with his saw and tell you Hillary has already been elected …… I know, you didn’t get the memo.

        The Republicans are self-destructing. In a national election Trump doesn’t stand a chance and beside Bush will be the candidate anyway. The deals in ………

        The players and the game should be dumped but then the people would have to THINK and to date they see elections as just another reality show but this one could kill them!

        Thanks sojourner.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. swo8 says:

    it almost doesn’t matter who gets elected, the shadow government will rule.
    Leslie

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I have quit watching soap operas There are much more rewarding ways to spend time.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. sojourner says:

    You wrote:

    “Bernie at least speaks for what he stands for and has a life long record to prove it. Tubularsock still’s going Green but Bernie is the best of what is offered. Which is shit wrapped in red, white, and blue!”

    I hear you. I do not disagree. Bernie, by far, would be the best choice, but that still isn’t saying much. Hell, I thought Ron Paul has made more sense than the rest, in certain respects. But they ate him up and spit him out, too!

    Bernie would be eaten alive (or assassinated), just like all the others who had some decency left in them.

    And yes, you’re right, these elections are settled years ahead of time. So Hillary and Jeb probably will be the candidates. Does it matter? Of course not! Neither Hillary nor Jeb will be making one move without one of the psychopath puppeteers pulling their strings.

    This always amazes me: even in the alt media, I hear people speaking of Barack as if he is in charge of his own actions. WTF! Never has Obomber been in charge, never! He’s a stooge, just like all his predecessors!

    This is why I no longer follow this every four year farce, just as I no longer listen to msm news.

    By the way, I meant Obummer looked good to the public, not to me. I wasn’t into the “election” cycle in 2008 either.

    Like

    • tubularsock says:

      sojourner Tubularsock was aware that you knew Obama sucked from the get-go and Tubularsock too was speaking about the public that still haven’t figure out he’s a puppet. Tubularsock liked much of what Ron Paul was pointing out as well but that entire “free-market” crap that can’t and will never happen is just talk. Tubularsock is afraid that big government could protect us from big business except now they are one and the same.
      Good-bye freedom ……..

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s